
SIGNIFICANT EVIDENCE FOR THE BLIND COPPER DEPOSIT IN WAI WAJO AREA SIKKA DISTRICT, EAST NUSA TENGGARA PROVINCE, 
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA
By
Franklin Rajagukguk, Bambang Pardiarto, Bambang Setiawan
Directorate of Mineral Resources Inventory
Franklin Rajagukguk, Bambang Pardiarto, Bambang Setiawan
Directorate of Mineral Resources Inventory
 ABSTRACT
The  Lowo Deba prospect is located in Wai Wajo area, Sikka district, East  Nusa Tenggara province, Republic of Indonesia. The Wai Wajo prospect was  discovered as a result of a systematic exploration program by  Directorate of Mineral Resources (DMR) since 1999-2000 and 2002, and  than proceed on the year 2003 – 2004 by DMRI – KORES, focused on base  metal and precious metal mineralization.The  geology of the prospect area consists of Miocene volcanics of Kiro  Formation and Tanahau Formation and intrusive of granodiorite and  Quaternary volcanics. From the chemical analysis results of major  elements of representative volcanics shows characteristic of toleiitic  magma. The predominant system of lineaments in the prospect area tends  to be NE-SW trend. This fault system appears to have a closed  relationship with the mineralization in Lowo Deba prospect.Most  of base metal mineralization were hosted by phyllic – argillic  andesitc to dacitic tuff of Kiro Formation and Tanahau Formation and  intrusive of granodiorite with the occurrences of structure control of  epithermal type or massive sulfide type. Rock  samples indicate the mineralization types are disseminated, fracture  filling and quartz vein containing chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite,  covellite and pyrite. The best grade revealed from these rocks of 6,980  ppm Cu and 50 ppb Au, and from quartz vein of 4,868 ppm Cu and 57 ppb Au.Geochemical anomaly zones identify two  combined anomaly i.e. Au-Cu-Zn-Mo and Ag-Pb-Zn. Those anomalies are  concentrated in the phyllic and argillic andesitic tuff of Kiro  Formation. This anomaly area also occupied by base metal and gold  mineralization outcrops.Interesting  IP anomalies are found in electrode separation index of n=5 and n=7 in  line WA7 with chargeability value of 405.7 Msec and resistivity value of  37.7 Ohm-m. In general high chargeability and low resistivity anomalies  are developed of direction from southwest to northeast of prospect area  and these anomalies still open to the northeast. The high chargeability  value lets to predict presenting of blind copper deposits. Some bore  holes will be proposed for the next survey to confirm the present of  blind ore deposit in the prospect area. 
1. INTRODUCTION
This  paper is the first to describe and interpret in detail the geology,  geochemical and geophysical within Lowo Deba prospect as indicate  significant evidence for the blind copper deposit in Sikka district,  East Nusa Tenggara Province, Republic of Indonesia. The  study based on quantitative of rock and mineral characteristics as well  as geologic mapping, petrography, mineragraphy, fluid inclusion, rock  chemistry and geochemical data and geophysical data. No attempt is made  at this stage of investigation to compare the Wai Wajo blind copper  deposit to other mineral occurrences.
1.1 Location and Access
 The  Lowo Deba prospect lies within the following coordinates (UTM) of  392700 – 393300 mE and 9043000 – 9042500 mN, located in the Wai Wajo  area, Sikka district, East Nusa Tenggara Province, Republic of Indonesia(Fig.  1). Domestic airlines provide daily service to the provincial capital  of Maumere, and travel from there to southwest Mego sub district by road  takes 45 minutes. 
 
 Fig.1 Location of prospect area1.2 Background of the project area
Korea  Resources Corporation (KORES) and Directorate General of Geology and  Mineral Resources (DGGMR) under The Memorandum of Understanding between  KORES and DGGMR signed on June 7th 2002 in  Jakarta, concerning a joint Mineral Resources Inventory and Exploration  in Indonesia conducted an exploration of the precious and base metal  potential in Sikka-Ende Area, East Nusa Tenggara Province.The  First Phase of Joint Mineral Exploration in Project area was started in  2003. The first phase of joint mineral Exploration between KORES and  DMRI was regional survey involving geological and geochemical  investigations and in order to make out the potential metallic mineral  resources in the survey area.The  second Phase survey aims to follow-up of the first Phase exploration  data and information of precious and base metal prospect by elucidating  the geologic setting, the relationship between mineralization and  geologic structure, and the mode of occurrences of mineral deposits  through geological survey, geochemical and geophysical prospecting and  than delineate of large-scale area.
1.3 Discovery of prospect area
The  Lowo Deba prospect was discovered as a result of a systematic  exploration program by Directorate of Mineral Resources (DMR) since  1999-2000 and 2002, and than proceed on the year 2003 – 2004 by DMRI –  KORES, focused on base metal and precious metal mineralization. In  1999, as well as Wai Wajo, the exploration team identified mineral  occurrences of disseminated copper sulphides in Tertiary volcanic,  granitic intrusion and quartz vein. Associated reconnaissance stream  sediment and float sampling this area has identified some anomalous  copper including gold. The Float assay from Lowo Mego River revealed of  10 % Cu and 520 ppb Au. Follow-up  work in year 2000, the geophysics team has identified the geomagnetic  anomaly showing NW-SE, N-S, and NE-SW trending similar to the fault  structures. The mineralization was controlled by NE-SW trending fault  and the andesite – diorite intrusion filled along this structure. The  IP anomaly indicates the mineralization zone of the Lowo Mego still open  to the NNE in Wai Wajo tributaries (Lowo Deba).In  2002 Directorate of Mineral Resources Inventory (DMRI) conducted  follow-up work focusing in Lowo Mego and its tributaries (Lowo Deba) by  geochemical soil ridge and spurs with 100 m interval each point sampling  and made of 50 m long of trenching with 1 m sampling interval in the  middle part of Lowo Deba creek. The results of the survey has identified  strong anomalous zones of Cu-Pb-Mn-Mo in phyllic – advanced argillic  Tertiary volcanic tuff and from trench shows well mineralization  silicified andesitic. Rock assay revealed 4,980 ppm Cu and 45 ppb Au.By  these data and information, the surface extension of mineralization at  Lowo Deba was programmed in 2003 – 2004 by alteration mapping,  trenching, geochemical soil grid system and geophysical prospecting  (Induced Polarization method). Hopely the investigation will let to discover of blind deposit in the prospect area.
2. EXPLORATION RESULTS2.1 Geology Survey
According  to existing geological maps, the regional geology of the project area  is composed mainly of Tertiary volcanic rock, sedimentary and intrusive  body and Quaternary volcanic rock (Fig. 2). While from the surface  mapping, the  geology of the prospect area consists of Miocene volcanics of Kiro  Formation and Tanahau Formation and intrusive of granodiorite and  Quaternary volcanics (Fig.3). From the chemical analysis results of  major elements of representative volcanics in the Wai Wajo area are  belong to calc-alkaline and tholeitic series based on Na2O + K2O versus SiO2 diagram as seen in Figure 4.The  predominant system of lineaments has been interpreted and extracted in  the whole survey area tends to be NNW- NNE trend. High-density  occurrences of lineaments are found in eastern part of Wai Wajo. Field  observation and plotting of joints (Fig.5) from the prospect area are  interpretated as two major lateral slip fault systems showing NE-SW and  N-S trend. The NE-SW fault systems is the most dominant in the Lowo Deba  prospect area and the mineralization in this area appears to have a  closed relationship with this fault systems.Most  of base metal mineralization was hosted by phyllic – argillic andesitc  to dacitic tuff of Kiro Formation and Tanahau Formation and intrusive  of granodiorite with the occurrences of structure control of epithermal  or massive sulfide type. In  Lowo Deba the mineralization generally has been found within  hydrothermal alteration as argillic and advanced argillic andesitic tuff  of Kiro Formation throughout structure opening (Fig.6). Rock samples  indicated the mineralization types are disseminated, fractures filling  and quartz vein (Fig.7) containing chalcopyrite, galena, sphalerite,  covellite and pyrite. The best grade revealed of 6,980 ppm Cu and 50 ppb  Au. The  occurrences of quartz veins in the survey area closely related to  structural control such as normal fault, lateral fault and opening as  dilation jogs affected by both faults. The quartz veins are generally  hosted by silicified andesitic tuff, altered dacitic lapilli tuff and  granodioritic and the best grade revealed of 4868 ppm Cu and 57 ppb Au.Ore  microscopic study (Fig.8) from some veins shows not any significant  mineralization, however from hand specimen observation indicates some  secondary minerals after chalcopyrite such as covellit, malachite and  chalcocite are present.Ore microscopic indicates the paragenesis of several samples can be described as follows:PyriteChalcopyriteCovelliteChalcositeIron oxideFluid  inclusions studies were examined in four samples of white to gray milky  quartz derived from several hydrothermal veins around and along the  Lowo Deba creek. The result of these examinations and calculations are  shown in Table 1.Two  types of primary inclusions were recognized in the survey area and  classified according to the phases presented at room temperature and  their behavior on heating and freezing. Each type is described as  follows.
Type I :  It consists of a liquid dominantly and a vapor phase and show filling  degree of 80 to 90 vol. %. Type I inclusions are 10 to 25μm in size and  are found in isolated, randomly distributed occurrences and show  rounded shape. These inclusions are homogenized to the liquid phase upon  heating and contain daughter minerals.
Type II :  It is vapor-rich inclusions and show filling degree of 60 to 80-vol %  at room temperature. These inclusions occur as primary and show  irregular shape. They are usually 5 to 30μm  in size. These inclusions are homogenized to the vapor phase upon  heating and do not contain daughter minerals. Homogenization  temperatures of primary liquid-rich H2O type fluid inclusions  in ore stage white to milky quartz from the deposits range from 177° C  to 326° C (Figure 9). The ranges of homogenization temperatures of  primary fluid inclusions in quartz related to the ore mineralization are  different. Liquid-rich H2O type inclusions in white to milky  quartz related to main ore mineralization homogenize at relatively  lower temperatures between 177° C and 284° C than these in barren  quartz. Salinities of liquid-rich H2O type inclusion in ore stage quartz related to ore mineralization range from 3.7 to 12.4 equiv. wt. % NaCl (Figure 10). During  the mineralization episodes, variations in temperature and composition  of the hydrothermal fluids are recorded by fluid inclusions. The  homogenization temperatures of primary inclusions in main stage minerals  range from 320° C to 170° C. Fluid inclusion data indicate that fluid  evolved from initial high temperature (near 320° C) to lower  temperature (near 170° C). Therefore, it is probable that Au and base  metal mineralization occurred at narrow temperature range of 170° C to 250°  C. Fluid inclusion data indicate that there is a progressive decrease  of average temperature with paragenetic time. Mineralization stages  evolved from initial higher temperatures (> 320° C) to later lower  temperatures (near 170° C). Each of these stages represents a separate  mineralizing system, which cooled and abated prior to the onset of the  next. The nearly linear relationship between homogenization temperatures  and salinities of fluid inclusions from stages indicates a history of  progressive cooling and dilution of ore-forming fluids.During  the early to main mineralization of ore stage the boiling of  hydrothermal fluids led to high but variable salinities. Later cooling  and dilution of fluids, which mainly deposited barren quartz in late ore  veins in the deposits, resulted in the positive linear relationship  between temperature and salinity. The relationship between  homogenization temperature and salinities are shown in Figure 10.
2.2 Geochemical Survey
 Geochemical  soil sampling grid system an area of 1 x 1 km with 50 m interval in  Lowo Deba revealed anomalous zones of Cu, Pb, Zn, Au, Ag and Mo elements  of various sizes and also identified two general geochemical anomalous  zones in which different elements are overlap.The distribution of anomaly zone can be grouped into two combined anomaly i.e.  Au-Cu-Mo  and Ag-Pb-Zn. First anomaly is Au-Cu-Mo is distributed in the middle of  Lowo Deba prospect and concentrated in the phyllic and argillic  andesitic tuff of Kiro Formation. This anomaly area also occupied by  base metal and gold mineralization outcrops. The second combined anomaly  of Ag – Pb – Zn is distributed in the middle and northeastern part of  Lowo Deba (see Figure 6), concentrated within advanced argillic and  argillic dacitic tuff of Tanahau Formation and partly in andesitc tuff  of Kiro Formation,  showing the similar pattern to first group.Based  on the statistical calculation (Table 2) this element distribution  group shows the normal distribution pattern, while the probability plot  was inferred to be derived from one population or one-mineralization  source (Fig.11). From the histogram (Fig.11) analyses indicate the  normal distribution and from the probability plot inferred derived from  difference mineralization source. The presence of the first group, which  is inferred, to be related with the mineralization process forming at  high temperature/deep zone. While the appearance of the second group  supposed to be related with mineralization process at low temperature  (epithermal).
2.3 Geophysical Survey 
IP  survey in Lowo Deba Prospect area is conducted of 12 lines (Fig.14),  and from that lines interesting IP anomalies are found from line WA4 to  line WA12 in electrode separation index of n=5 and n=7 as represents of illustrated lateral variation of chargeability and resistivity in depth of 75.0 m and 100.0 m approximately. The  high chargeability anomaly for n5 spread along the river of east branch  and west branch of Lowo Deba River as showing in figure 12 (c). The  chargeability values for n5 have a range of 1.0 ~ 210.0 Msec. There are  two high chargeability anomalies in this map. One anomaly lay along the  main river of the central prospect area. This anomaly zone is divided by  three high chargeability anomalies. The first anomaly is found at the  west side of the main river in line WA4 and has high chargeability of 125.5  Msec. Also the second anomaly lay along Lowo Deba River in the central  prospect area and has maximum value of 105.0 Msec. The third anomaly is  found in northern part of prospect area as the east branch of Lowo Deba  River and has a maximum chargeability value of 198.8 Msec.For  n7, there are three high chargeability anomalies zone as seen in figure  12 (d). The first high chargeability anomaly is distributed in the  central part of the prospect area along the Lowo Deba River and this  anomaly has chargeability values from 20.0 to 420.0 Msec. In general  this high chargeability anomaly spread from southwest to northeast and  concentrate in the central part of the line WA6, WA7 and WA8 and in the  northeastern part of the line WA10, WA11 and WA12. This anomaly still  has potential of development toward northeastern part of this prospect  area. Three high chargeability anomaly points of line WA4 have the  maximum chargeability value of 142.7 Msec. Also second high  chargeability anomaly is found in the western part of this area in the  line WA8, WA9 and WA10 with chargeability value of 134.3 Msec. The third  high chargeability anomaly is found in the west branch of Lowo Deba  River in the northern part of this area with chargeability value of 91.0  Msec. Resistivity  anomalies coincide with chargeability anomalies of n5 along the river,  east branch and west branch of Lowo Deba River as showing in figure 13  (c). The resistivity anomaly values of n5 have a range of 0.0 ~ 4000.0  Ohm-m. Two resistivity anomalies are related with high chargeability  anomalies. First resistivity anomaly is developed along the main river  and to locate central part and east branch of Lowo Deba. And this low  resistivity anomaly coincides with high chargeability anomalies of  composed three spots in this site. In this resistivity anomaly resisvity  value is less than 200.0 Ohm-m. The other high resistivity anomaly at  the southern part of this map is found in east branch of Lowo Deba River  at line WA4 as high resistivity anomaly. There  are three low resistivity anomalies in index n7 on this map as showing  figure 13(d). The first low resistivity anomaly is found in the central  part of the prospect area along the Lowo Deba River including west  branch and east branch. And this anomaly spread from southwest to  northeast at line WA6, WA7, WA8, WA10, WA11 and WA12 with resistivity  values of 0.0 – 150.0 Ohm-mAlso  this low resistivity anomaly has more potential to develop to the  northeastern part of this prospect area. The second low resistivity  anomaly is found in the northern part of this area in the west branch of  Lowo Deba River and has minimum value of 47.1 Ohm-m. The third low  resistivity anomaly is found in the western part of this area in the  line of WA8, WA9 and WA10 with minimum value of 42.6 Ohm-m. 
3. DISCUSSION 
During  the whole survey of the mineral exploration project in Lowo Deba  prospect area, documents and information on geology and mineral  resources of the prospect area were compiled, while geochemical and  geophysical data has been analyzed and interpreted. Regional and  detailed geological survey, geochemical soil survey and geophysical  prospecting were carried out to select the target area for drilling  survey.Cu-Pb-Zn  mineralization and geochemical anomaly zones were identified in  Tertiary volcanic/intrusion and pyroclastic rocks of the survey area.  The main anomalous of Au-Cu-Mo is widely distributed in the middle of  prospect area. The anomalous zone is occupied by phyllic-argillic  andesitic tuff and associated with gold and base metal mineralization  outcrops. Fluid inclusion study indicates that fluid evolved from 3200 C to 1700 C.Geophysical  IP prospecting found the area, which is most significant anomaly in  line WA7 with chargeability value of 405.7 Msec and resistivity value of  37.7 Ohm-m.According  to supported data including geology, geochemical and geophysical survey  lets to predict that mineralization type supposed to be epithermal and  massive sulphides. The high chargeability value suggests presenting the  blind ore deposits below the surface. Some bore holes will be proposed  to confirm the present of blind deposit.
4. CONCLUSSION
In  Lowo Deba prospect, most of base metal mineralization was hosted by  phyllic – argillic andesitc to dacitic tuff of Kiro Formation and  Tanahau Formation and intrusive of granodiorite with the occurrences of  structure control of epithermal type or massive sulfide type. This  evidence supported by indication of fluid inclusion study results,  geochemical anomalous of base metal and gold and geophysical IP method  resulting anomalous zones of high chargeability and low resistivity.
 REFERENCES
- Ahrens, L.H., 1954. Lognormal distributions of the elements. Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta 5, p. 49 – 73.
- Franklin et al, 1999, Eksplorasi Logam Mulia dan Logam Dasar di Daerah Wai Wajo dan Sekitarnya Kabupaten SIKKA – Nusa Tenggara Timur. Proyek Eksplorasi Bahan Galian Mineral Indonesia. SubDirektorat Eksplorasi Mineral Logam, Direktorat Sumberdaya Mineral, Bandung.
- Franklin et al, 2002, Inventarisasi Endapan Molibdenum dan Logam Dasar Serta Mineral Logam Ikutannya di Daerah Wai Wajo Kabupaten SIKKA Provinsi Nusa Tenggara Timur, Proyek Eksplorasi Bahan Galian Mineral Indonesia. SubDirektorat Eksplorasi Mineral Logam, Direktorat Sumberdaya Mineral, Bandung.
- Hamilton, W.B., 1979, Tectonics of the Indonesian region. Prof.Paper 1078, U.S.Geol.Surv. Washington, DC, 345 pp.
- Hedenquist, J.W., 1996, “Hydrothermal System in Volcanic Arcsâ€, Mineral Resources Department, Geological Survey of Japan, Tsukuba, Japan.
- Hendaryono, 1999, Geologie de I’ile de Flores . Apports a l’etude de la geodynamique de l’archipel indonesien oriental. 200 p. ISBN 2-904431-21-7. Resume Francais, indonesien.
- J.C, Carlile; A.H.G.Mitchelle, 1994, Journal of Geochemical Exploration 50. 91 - 142 pp.
- J.V. Lawless, P.J. White, I. Bogie, Important Hydrothermal Minerals and Their Significance. Kingston Morrison Mineral Services, Nov 1994.
- Katili, J.A., 1974, Geologi Enviornment of the Indonesian Mineral Deposit., publikasi Teknik seri Geologi Ekonomi No.7, Direktorat Geologi.Lepeltier, C., 1969. A simplified statistical treatment of geochemical data by graphical representation. Econ. Geol., v.6 p. 538 – 550.
- Nishimura.S, Y.Otofuji, T.Ikeda, E.Abe, T.Yokoyoma, F.Kobayashi, S.Hadiwisastra, J.Sopaheluwakan, F.Hehuwat, 1981, Physical geology of the Sumba, Sumbawa and Flores Islands, spec.Publ.2, Geol.Res.Dev. Centre. Bandung, p.111.
- N. Suwarna, S.Santosa, Koesoemadinata., 1990, Geologi Lembar Ende 1:250.000, Nusa Tenggara Timur., Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Geologi Bandung.
- Parasnis D.S, 1962, “Principle of Applied Geophysicsâ€, Chap & Hall Ltd., UK.
- Priatna B., et al., 2000, “Laporan Eksplorasi Geofisika Mineral Logam di Daerah Wai Wajo, Sikka, Flores, NTTâ€, PEBGMI – DSM.
- PT.Nusa Lontar Mining, 1987, Contract of Work, First Relinquishment Report, Nusa Tenggara Timur, Indonesia (9757).
- Sinclair, A.J., 1976. Application of Probability Graphs in Mineral Exploration; Ass. Explor. Geochem., Spec. Vol. 4, 95 pp.
- Sutrisno et al., 2001, “Laporan Penyelidikan Geofisika Tematik di Daerah Sungai Mera, Kabupaten Sikka, Flores, NTTâ€, PIEBGMI – DIM.
- Telford W.M., et al., 1976, “Applied Geophysicsâ€, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
- Tudor, A, 1999, First Relinguishment Report and Upgrade from general Survey    Period to Exploration Period, Internal Flores Barat Mining (FBM) report.
- Tukey, J.W., 1977. Exploratory Data Analysis. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass. 506 pp.
 
 Fig.2 Regional Geological map of Wai Wajo and its surrounding

Fig.3 Geological map of Wai Wajo (Lowo Deba prospect)

Fig.4 Composition of volcanic rocks from Wai Wajo area

Fig.5 Main direction of joint measurement in Lowo Deba

Fig.6 Mineralization-alteration and geochemical anomaly map of Lowo Deba area

Fig.7 Mineralized Quartz vein from Lowo Deba

Fig.8 Microphotograph from sample KWA-13/A showing pyrite and chalcopyrite
| Sample No. | Mineralogy | Host mineral | P. | S. | Th(°) | Tm(°) | Eq.wt. % NaCl | 
| KWW-1/RF |  Py+gn+sp | gr.quartz | P (30) |  | 201° - 324° | -5.0°-1.0 | 4.2-10.6 | 
| KWW-2/RF |  Py+cpy+gn | m.quartz | P (31) |  | 209° - 308° | -0.8°-1.6 | 3.7-5.0 | 
| KWW-3/RF |  Py+gn | m.quartz | P (40) |  | 178° - 326° | -6.1°-3.0 | 7.3-12.4 | 
| KWW-4/RF |  py+cpy | gr.quartz | P (62) |  | 177° - 320° | -6.0°-1.0 | 4.1-12.2 | 

Fig.9 Histograms of homogenization temperatures of fluid inclusions
in the main mineralization stage quartz from Wai Wajo area
in the main mineralization stage quartz from Wai Wajo area

Fig.10 Plots  of homogenization temperatures versus salinity for primary Inclusions  in the main mineralization stage quartz from Wai Wajo area



Fig.13 Distribution of resistivity in Lowo Deba Prospect in index n5 and n7
 Â
 Fig.14 Geophysical IP prospecting in Lowo Deba area 
Table 2 Statistical calculation of geochemical soil in Lowo Deba 
| BLOCK A WAI WAJO AREA | Element | Max | Min | Mean | BackGround | Anomalous | Combined Anomalous | ||
| Weak | Moderate | Strong |  First anomalousAu – Cu  – MoAndSecond anomalousAg – Pb – Zn      | ||||||
| Au (ppb) | 32 | 1 | 4 | 1 | 2.07 < Au < 6.09 | 6.09 < Au < 17.28 | Au > 17.28 | ||
| Ag | 3 | 0.25 | 1 | 1 | 0.75 < Ag < 1.24 | 1.24 < Ag < 1.91 | Ag > 1.91 | ||
| Cu | 820 | 5 | 70 | 14 | 33.3 < Cu < 97.58 | 97.58 < Cu < 460.6 | Cu > 460.6 | ||
| Pb | 227 | 4 | 28 | 12 | 22.92 < Pb < 40.44 | 40.44 < Pb < 108.24 | Pb > 108.24 | ||
| Zn | 2546 | 32 | 239 | 77 | 164.78 < Zn < 378 | 378 < Zn < 937.09 | Zn > 937.09 | ||
| Mo | 17 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1.24 < Mo < 3.5 | 3.5 < Mo < 8.05 | Mo > 8.05 | ||
 
 
No comments:
Post a Comment